When I talked about alpha males, I mentioned Dominic, the "stalker." He is possessive; he won't go anywhere for fear that his lover might get attacked (even in vampire dramas, this gets a bit old), and he'd rather watch her sleep than do something healthy and normal. Like watch the football. Do a crossword. Or, you know...sleep himself. You'd think that in order to defeat the minions of hell, he'd want to keep himself in tip-top condition -- but no, you never see him slug down a protein shake or complain that the tied up captive in the cellar prevents him from getting his eight hours a night.
This woman is EVERYTHING to him and all he thinks about is her (well, her and work. A needy stalker needs to bring home the bacon lest anybody else do it, and thus pose a challenge). He's everywhere, and a lot of category romance specifications suggest that we should write this type of character because women actually like him.
Why do women like reading this guy, and how does he get away with such obsessive behaviour?
I think question two leads into question one. How does he get away with it? Usually:
1) He's gorgeous. Why would you send away the eye candy?
2) He's great in bed, which is always useful (ahem).
3) He's a vampire/werewolf/shapeshifter/demonic soduku champion. It's in his blood; he's just primal like that (because he's strong enough to take down an army, but not so much to deal with his own murderous urges. And there's our line of conflict -- again).
4) We want him to want us this much. It's a measure of how completely awesome we are; the more masculine and broody he is, the more feminine and delicate we feel. If he's tortured, we can fix that too -- that is the measure of our supersonic special...ness.
As women, do we want to be possessed? Owned? Or do we just long for a man who wants that, for the thrill of the chase? Is this guy one big refraction of our fantasy bedroom games, and if so...how would he function in the real world?
This fascinates me. I love twisting archetypes; I love getting beneath the skin of a character, finding out what makes them tick and then winding them like the proverbial clockwork (funny how a metaphor for being human makes one sound like such a robot, hmm?). The point is that Mr Stalker is, for want of a better word, a sociopath. That makes him ripe for all kinds of fun.
When I think about sociopath fiction, I don't go back to category romance (although I am reminded of Edward Cullen, twitchy and vamp-sexed as he is. Ahh. Sorry -- where was I again?). I think more along the lines of Humbert Humbert, Dorian Gray or Patrick Bateman: guys who seem completely normal until you get inside their heads, and then they're a carnival of paranoia and fantasy. Does he sound like a guy I'd want to marry? No. Do I want to write him? Hell yes!
This brings me to Adam, my new anti-hero. He's been "awake" in my head all night, marinating in cynicism and loathing. He's jaded and sharp and generally quite unpleasant...but he's in love. Naturally, the only way he can express it is in a generally unpleasant manner, and he does some very nasty things in the course of my new novel -- he does them, so he says, for love. He's like Iago and Othello rolled into a ball and sprinkled with dramatic irony. Granted, I'm not writing a romance. I'm writing a quiet, literary character study (hell, I suck at romance anyway. Happy ending? Where's the fun in that?!) but the switch in genre allows me to cut down to the question: why is he so fixated on a woman*? In romance, it's a given; delve in too deep and he'll look weak.The alpha tag slips away. In lit fiction, it was transient to begin with. His weakness is the playground and "love" is the wind that makes the swings creak all by themselves in the moonlight, like the intro to a seventies horror movie.
I can't wait to see if a reader will redeem him because of that love. They do it for much less, after all. I can't even say that it's a female trait; I've seen men redeem other men through sympathy and envy. There's a lot of talk of readers who want somebody to cast a villain, who want somebody to hate; when nobody's wearing the obsidian crown of doom, it's funny who ends up in that role.
It comes down to this: until the happy ending -- when you're on the precipice, wondering if it will come -- what's the difference between the hero of a love affair and the victim of a tragedy? Does our stalker-sociopath-ideal-lover walk the fine line in between? It's a dangerous place to be as a writer.
And I love it.
*Or in the case of Dorian Gray...fixated on himself. Metrosexual alphas. Le sigh.


Excellent post. I've always had a thing for Patrick Bateman!! Weird I know
x
Apparently not *that* weird, SG ;) Have you read American Pyscho? I love the style, but he's so intense that I can only do it in short bursts.
Why do women like these bad boys? It's crazy, yet fun. Here's a strange concept, what if the roles were reversed? What if it was a woman psychopath instead? Would she be revered in the same manner? My belief is no. (I'm planning to write such a novel, and it makes me think).
Anyway, nice to meet you fellow crusader.
Angela -- somebody on a forum posted recently and pointed out that a lot of these women have big issues of their own: namely, why *do* they keep telling this guy to go away when they're really attracted to him? (Is it because they know he's a sociopath? :P He isn't always!). You're right; the female characters are just as interesting in this regard. I should write about them...
I find your writing amazingly inspiring, highly amusing and all together too much fun!
While I'm sure I'm not the first to do so, sending my support and fanatic, but completely innocent, love from down under (Australia that is) !
xx
Off topic I know, but congrats on winning the Valentine's Day story competition on Literotica! Well done.
Lin
Bad boy characters, yum. Except the American Psycho guy, his character is WAY too psychotic for me!
I love your blog, by the way. So I've given you an award for it over on mine :O) http://bangouttheprose.blogspot.com/2011/02/stylish-blogger-award.html
Hey LV! I'm one of your Crusade group-mates :) Nice to meet you!
I love a good sociopath. I'm seriously looking forward to hearing Dexter creator Jeff Lindsay talk in person at our local writers' festival in a couple of weeks- he's created something amazing in those books (pretty different to the TV series in a lot of ways).
There was a time when my story featured a Very Bad Decision by my charismatic, gorgeous and nasty bad guy, in which he decided that no didn't mean no from his brother's fiance, and all hell subsequently broke loose. I moved away from that particular action as I got to know him better, and over time he softened out to something quite different from the rapist he'd originally been. I'm missing the bite it gave my story, though. I think I might have to tip events back that way sooner rather than later.
Looking forward to getting to know you and your characters better :)
Anonymous in Oz -- hello, and thank you :D (I'm sure it's all very innocent. Ahem).
Lin -- thank you too. I spent the prize money on books (paper ones) so it was for the good of the industry, right? :P
Suz -- I think Patrick Bateman being too psychotic for you is probably a good thing, lol (or at least a therapist would say so). And thank you for the award, how awesome!
Claire -- have mailed you :) Yay for Dexter -- I can't wait for the book to arrive!
Hello! I'm a fellow crusader and new follower. Nice to meet you.
Sodoku champion...haha. That one took me second reading. Great picture for your post. Who is that guy?
Fellow crusader and new follower now...nice to meetcha.
Fellow crusader here. I'm afraid the psychopath isn't for me...lived with one for a while. Don't want to go there, even in fiction.
I think bad boys make such interesting characters because women secretly want to be the ones to fix them.
Nikki
Great post. I've had this conversation with the brilliant Eileen Wiedbrauk, who argues that in Romance, supernatural he-men are becoming part of the norm because it's one way to preserve the gender divide upon which Romance as a genre depends.
I have no problem with the fantasy: I mean, hey, whatever floats your boat. But I wonder, along with Angela Scott up there (hi Angela!) if we could do more with women who act in the same way.
I would totally read that book, Angela.
Hey Elizabeth,
That's a really interesting debate (in fact I just blogged about the "psychopath" women in my Mary Sue post (as Bloody Mary Sues); have you read any of Stacia Kane's Downside books? Her heroine is an addict and it's an interesting angle. Women have problems writing female characters, I think. More men need to be writing romance in this regard (I've actually read some good stuff).
Re. the gender divide...hmm. I think old school romance banks on alpha males, yes, and people now extremes where that is concerned (I blogged about that too, lol). But old school romance publishers are slowly being questioned by their female audience. Personally, I think he-men will be around for as long as women have low self esteem and seek male approval (that sounds patronising; it's not what what I mean).
Hi, Lucy, fellow Campaigner. Stopped by, and my goddess! I'm gobbling up your posts here. I've been working on my fourt WIP, and I veer away from pure romance because -- wow, it gets boring. Okay, when are they going to do it already?? Because you know they will.
Anway. Great stuff. Just wanted to jump in and put up a comment here. See you around, I'm a new follower, hope to see you over on one of my blogs!
LV: As a woman who usually takes control in both home and work situations, the attraction to the fictional alpha male (because let's face it, the real thing ain't usually so sexy) is all about escapism for me. Everything to do with letting go of control and nothing to do with my self-esteem.
So many women are natural caretakers (responsible for the kids, for the success of the holiday traditions, for the beauty of all things external, even throw in a job) that it's just wonderful to imagine a man who can it all away with his strength of personality, and other important boy parts.
Of course that why I found myself rooting for the deliciously bad, and highly intelligent Joesph, and not the immensely lovable Matt in your wonderful new book. God, Matt can even sing and I still wanted Joesph to get the girl in the end. Brilliant work. You are on my favorites list, right there with Megan Hart.
Hey Anonymous :)
I think you're right about escapism. I know I certainly fall under that umbrella. And thank you for the fabulous compliments--you've made my day.